Article
Managing B2B Profiles for Full Funnel Optimization
Best Practices: Managing Buyer Profiles

As B2B marketers, our goal is to deliver effective campaigns targeted at the best opportunities that exist within our Total Addressable Market (TAM). Of course, this means identifying your TAM is the first step. The following steps are – developing your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP), comparing your ICP throughout your TAM to determine which opportunities to focus on, and then getting the right campaigns in front of them at the right time. Unfortunately, traditional approaches leave us with siloed data, stagnant (or incomplete) profiles, and the inability to support all opportunities within an account at scale. Not to mention, the amount of effort, money and time that is wasted in going after the inaccurate accounts/profiles.
For this precise reason – there is a need to constantly create (and keep updated) more accurate, dynamic profiles for people, accounts and buying centers so we can properly prioritize and target opportunities with the right campaigns. ABM in the last few years has been the go-to strategy for most B2B marketers to tackle this issue—it sure is useful in identifying the right accounts, assuming you’ve properly compiled your siloed data. However, it fails in identifying the buying teams and targeting the right people within those accounts. It does not factor in the best profiles that as a marketer one would like to target or sales would like to engage with.
So how do we make sure we have the best B2B profiles?
No matter which technology you end up using for creating and maintaining the profiles in your systems – you need to ensure that the vendor provides some of the basic capabilities—as outlined below:
Provide third-party account & person data, from a combination of leading B2B data sources.
Unification of first- and third-party data for account context and prioritization.
Full account profiles including hierarchies, firmographics, standard or advanced technographics (web, SaaS and installed software and hardware), regular cadence of intent and mobile contacts.
Direct integrations into CRM, marketing automation and other data platforms.
Complete, up-to-date B2B profiles to target the right accounts and people, with real-time data enrichment, comprehensive segmentation criteria, intent, buyer persona scoring—and easily upgradable to advanced predictive profiling.
Simple, straightforward pricing with all-inclusive discovery, enrichment, and form fills— a fraction of the cost of alternatives.
Unified first- and third- party data including firmographics, demographics, technographics, account intent, mobile phones, account & contact context, specialties and more.
Open, uncompromised quality with dozens of data partners, multisource validation, semantic categorization, and both scheduled and real-time enrichment.
Tools like Customer Data Platforms can provide all of these capabilities beyond unification as they integrate AI-optimized buying signals from curated third-party data-sources that go into building dynamic, multi-level buyer profiles which are regularly updated for accurate, timely understanding of your buyers. That, in conjunction with scoring models (Fit, Intent, Persona, TAM, and ICP), it’s easier than ever for B2B marketers to target the right people, with the right campaigns, at the right time. Read this product sheet to learn more about what to look for as you build your B2B profiles and optimize the whole process so that once you’ve discovered your TAM, buyer profiles are created at the person, account, and buying center levels – meaning you can segment, score, and prioritize entire buying groups - as well as individuals within accounts - instead of just accounts.
B2B Profiling enables big and small B2B companies to minimize spend and maximize ROI by equipping them with the tools necessary to proactively target the accounts and/or people with the highest propensity to buy. Fuel and optimize your demand funnel with the best B2B buyer profiles enhanced by predictive fit, persona and intent models to revolutionize your TAM-to-opportunity prioritization and drive a full funnel optimization.
Latest Articles

Article
Why CRM data decays faster than you think
Your CRM starts losing value the day a record enters the system.
People change jobs. Teams rename roles. Companies shift ownership. Email addresses expire. Phone numbers route somewhere else. What looked usable last quarter now creates friction across sales, marketing, and RevOps.
That is why data quality is not a cleanup project. It is an operating requirement.
If you treat CRM hygiene as a quarterly task, you let decay spread into routing, scoring, segmentation, and reporting. If you rely on stale records and weak third-party data, you make every GTM motion harder to trust.
For teams running modern revenue systems, positions decay is a GTM risk. A contact record with the wrong title, business unit, or reporting line does more than bounce an email. It distorts who you target, how you prioritize accounts, and where you send sellers next.

Article
Lead-to-account matching in Salesforce: what breaks and how to fix it
If you run inbound lead management in Salesforce, lead-to-account matching shapes more than routing. It decides whether the right account owner sees the lead, whether scoring reflects the full relationship, and whether your team acts on one buyer or a fragmented set of records.
That is why duplicate management and data deduplication sit at the center of lead-to-account matching. When matching fails, inbound speed drops, account context disappears, and revenue teams lose trust in Salesforce.
You feel the problem fast. A form fill lands. Salesforce creates a lead. The lead does not match the right account. Sales gets a net-new name with no account history. Marketing sees weak attribution. RevOps inherits more cleanup work.
This is not a Salesforce setting problem alone. It is an identity resolution and data hygiene problem that shows up inside Salesforce first.

Article
Buying group identification: how to map stakeholders before the deal stalls
Your pipeline does not stall because one lead goes quiet. It stalls because your team misses the full buying group.
That gap shows up early. You target one contact, score one response, and route one record. Meanwhile, the real decision sits across finance, IT, operations, procurement, and line-of-business leaders.
If you still treat leads as the GTM unit of execution, you lose visibility when deals gain complexity. Buying teams framed as GTM unit of execution give you a better model. You see who shapes the decision, who blocks it, and who needs proof before the deal moves.
That matters because B2B purchases now involve larger groups and more friction. 6sense reports that B2B buying groups average 10+ members. Forrester reports that 73% of purchases involve three or more departments. If you do not map the group early, your team reacts late.
For MOFU teams, the goal is not more names in a list. The goal is reliable buying group identification that links people, roles, accounts, and signals in time for action. That is where Custom Audiences and Third-Party Data start to matter.


