Article
Intent Data Should Work Harder
Remember – a good lead at a bad company is ultimately a bad lead.
Everyone benefits from having a list of all the people and companies that have been actively searching for your product or service this week, right? That’s been the promise of Intent data. GTM teams rely on that Intent signal and often waste even more of their valuable time and resources chasing down what amounts to bad leads. Clearly, intent models don’t work very well – they should’ve just trusted their gut, right?
Wrong. They should’ve trusted the data. As in, all the data. Not just intent. Relying on intent data alone is the error that pushes some many sales and marketing teams away from it. You need to remember, intent alone doesn’t paint the full picture necessary to target deals in the B2B world. In fact, intent data can even point us in the wrong direction and encourage our sales people to confidently jump into a rabbit hole that goes nowhere fast. Let’s explore how to use intent data effectively and avoid diving head-first into a pit of bad leads.
The cost of getting it wrong.
Latest Articles
Article
CRM Data Governance for RevOps: A Practical Framework
Your CRM only works when your data holds up under pressure. Once records sprawl across forms, enrichment tools, routing logic, and sales workflows, small errors turn into system-wide failures. That is why CRM data governance sits at the center of revenue execution.
If you lead RevOps, you need a framework that keeps records accurate, usable, and trusted across teams. You also need a Data Management System that supports governance in daily operations, not in policy documents that no one follows. The right structure improves Data Quality, strengthens Enterprise Data Management, and gives your team a cleaner path to scale.
This guide gives you a practical framework for CRM data governance. You will see what to govern, who owns it, which controls matter, and how to make your Data Management System support better execution.
Article
The Next Era of GTM: Why Data Architecture Is Now a Revenue Strategy
For years, companies treated data as something that supported go-to-market. Marketing generated it. Sales updated it. RevOps cleaned it up.
Now it determines whether go-to-market works at all.
According to Gartner, B2B buyers spend only 17% of their total buying journey meeting with potential suppliers, and that time is divided across multiple vendors. That means the majority of influence, research, and evaluation happens digitally and independently before sales is engaged.
At the same time, Forrester reports that the typical B2B buying group now includes 6 to 10 decision-makers, each consuming different information and interacting across different channels.
The implication is clear: GTM has become structurally more complex. And complexity without architectural discipline creates revenue drag.
The next era of go-to-market will not be won by louder campaigns or larger sales teams. It will be won by companies that treat data architecture as revenue strategy.
Article
The Hidden Revenue Tax: 10 Ways Enterprise GTM Teams Lose with Disconnected Data
Enterprise B2B go-to-market (GTM) teams don’t struggle because they lack tools. They struggle because their customer data lives everywhere, but doesn’t work correctly anywhere.
CRM. Marketing automation. Enrichment vendors. Intent platforms. Sales engagement. Data warehouses. Acquired company databases. Regional instances.
Each system holds a piece of the puzzle but none of them independently point towards the same truth. When customer data is fragmented, siloed, and static, the consequences surface exponentially.
Here’s what that really looks like inside an enterprise GTM organization.
