Article

2025 Predictions: GTM Becomes A Focused Team Sport

This week marks the end of 2024 and the start of 2025. So what did we learn in 2024 and what are the next big things that will drive GTM excellence this coming year?

Economic uncertainty drove prioritization and doing more with less and became the central theme in 2024. Departments moved to consolidate vendors, measure ROI and analyze the Revenue Data and AI signals that mattered the most. Some of the shine came off of company-level signals as GTM teams looked to find demand signals that are more actionable – intent at the city level not just country, persona signals not just department, product signals to indicate divisions. GenAI for content development became rampant and many organizations, departments and teams deployed multiple tools across multiple channels. But here’s the rub. Most of these efforts were done at the departmental level. Siloed efforts in Sales or Marketing.

How is this possible? Revenue operations or RevOps professionals are all championing joint strategies across sales and marketing, right? But how many revenue ops people are out there?  If you search the hundreds of millions of titles in LinkedIn you will see that there are very few companies that have anyone with the title of revenue operations – less than 1 percent of the companies on LinkedIn. So most sales and marketing operations are left to making this happen on their own – in separate departments with separate budgets and often separate goals.

What does this spell? S_I_L_O_S. Data silos. Strategy silos. Budget silos. Performance silos. And what are the companies who are actively breaking down these silos doing?

I’ll share a story about a high tech company in the hardware industry. In this company, both sales and marketing operations report into the COO. The team was tasked to work together to reorganize the sales and marketing investments. They started first by identifying a TAM for every company out there that mattered and rank ordered them for a new sales and marketing coverage model. Once this was done, then all investments in both sales and marketing were tasked with focusing engagement efforts squarely on this prioritized set of accounts, prioritized buying teams and prioritized solution offers. Within a few quarters more than 80% of the inbound lead flow of the company fell within the TAM. This focus meant increased pipeline generation in the right accounts with the right buyers and the right value proposition. This spells F_O_C_U_S. So how will this be tackled in 2025?

Let’s face it. Sales, marketing and SDR teams are in the same company but on separate teams – from the data and tools they use to the targets and goals they have. Alignment is missing across most B2B organizations. We believe it will fall on RevOps or tight coupled sales and marketing ops teams to take the lead in turning Go-to-Market (GTM) efforts across organization into a team sport. CMOs and CROs will be responsible for tearing down the walls between sales and marketing. Why do we believe this? Let’s look at three main predictions we expect to see championed by RevOps in the B2B sales and marketing environment in 2025 to overcome organizational misalignment.

2. GTM teams will become aligned on actionable buying signals. They will agree on what they are and what they mean and prioritized into a shared resource across teams. Individual signals will not be good enough.

Latest Articles
Most free prospecting tools are just trials in disguise. See what makes a free tier real — verified contact data and fit scoring, right in your browser.

Article

What free prospecting tools actually stay free?

You found a free tool. You signed up, poked around, and it worked. Then thirty days later, the feature you actually needed moved behind a paywall. Sound familiar?


Free has a reputation for being temporary. In B2B sales, that reputation is mostly earned. Most tools that call themselves free are running a trial with a timer you can't see. The prospecting category is especially guilty of this. You get a handful of credits, a stripped-down dashboard, and a persistent upgrade banner that follows you everywhere.


But not every free tier is a trick. Some tools offer real, repeatable value without demanding a credit card the moment you start doing actual work. The difference lies in what the tool is built to do, who it's built for, and whether free is a real product or just a funnel.


Here's how to think about the free tools in your prospecting stack, what to watch for, and what actually holds up when you test it against a real quota.

Learn what website visitor identification is and how it turns anonymous traffic into real-time GTM signals for your revenue team.

Article

What Is Website Visitor Identification?

Your website gets traffic every day. Some visitors convert. Most do not. The ones who leave without filling out a form are not gone forever, but without website visitor identification, your revenue team has no way to know who they were or what they were looking at.


Website visitor identification is the process of resolving anonymous website activity into known accounts, contacts, and buying signals. It connects the dots between an IP address or browser session and an actual company or person in your target market.


For revenue teams operating at scale, this is not a nice-to-have. It is a foundational capability for any go-to-market system that depends on real-time data to drive engagement, routing, and pipeline.

Article

6sense vs Demandbase: What Each One Solves, and What Neither Does

You already know the pitch decks. Two platforms, two intent graphs, two claims to own the account-based motion.


The real question is not which vendor wins a bake-off. The question is what each platform actually solves inside your revenue stack, and what still breaks after you deploy one.


Most teams evaluating 6sense vs Demandbase are trying to fix an execution problem with an orchestration tool. That works until the underlying data fails. Then scoring drifts, routing misfires, and your reps stop trusting the priority list.


This post breaks down where each platform is strong, where both leave gaps, and what you need underneath them to make either one perform.